Talk:Foreign relations of Pakistan

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani politics.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations C‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article Pakistan–Uruguay relations was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 January 2015 with a consensus to merge the content into Foreign relations of Pakistan. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.

Untitled

This article is a mess - it's badly written and terribly difficult to read and digest, plus there's grammar and spelling mistakes throughout. Badly in need of a clean-up. --220.238.57.19 (talk) 11:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the claim that Osama Bin Laden is hiding somewhere on the border since he is not that significant a person in Afghan-Pakistani relations.

The whole article is riddled with Biases against India. I am neutralizing this polarized article. This article is also bugged with several spelling mistakes. I'll correct as many as I can find. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pravictor (talk • contribs) 17:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh's relationship with Pakistan has never recovered after 1971 war. Despite an officially friendly relationship, Bangladesh's claims for war damages as well as a national apology is ill received in Pakistan. - alif.

Article needs a Turkey section as two countries have very strong relations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.99.81.232 (talk) 11:40, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jakohlhorst, Andrewros15, Cmonteleon.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lengthy pages

This article requires abstraction. There is too much repeated information in the article which a reader can read in for example Pakistan-X relations pages. So rather then including so much information about Pakistan-USA, Pakistan-India, with Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan, and going in-depth about conflict with India in the main page, the user can be provided with basic information about relationship with each country, those interested can do further reading by visiting the Pakistan-X relations. Three sections are sufficient, 1) Main section, 2) Key element of Pakistan foreign policy, 3) Pakistan relation with the world, with sub sectioned into relationship with different countries. Each sub section of section 3 should have brief information (4-5 lines) of information of Pakistan relationship with that country. If that relationship requires a more justification and details, then those information be written on a Pakistan-X relations page, and user given link of See Pakistan-X relations. (Jalal0 (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

look at the pak-tajik section..............muddleup in cities182.177.84.196 (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maldives section error

Can someone please explain to me how only Pakistan and the Maldives are a majority Sunni, when 90% of Muslims are Sunni? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.146.83 (talk) 00:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relations With India Portion = Bullshit

Has anyone had the time to read this shiv sena garbage? I'm going to go ahead and edit out some trash. I'm also going to add a few countries in such as Turkey and Azerbaijan.-Bk2006 15:29 October 25 2007 (UTC)

There needs to be a seperate section for Saudi Arabia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.213.140.21 (talk) 04:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United Canadian Provinces??

The official name of Canada is NOT the United Canadian Provinces, lol. It is simply Canada, before the repatriation of the constitution it was the Dominion of Canada, now it is Canada.

this article

needs a lot of work:

real blatant pro Pakistan uncited POV has leaked in
completely lacking citations in many parts
excessive text when Pakistan-X article already exists.

LibStar (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then make the changes and/or suggest where to do so. The tag has been on for a year or so without any changes.Lihaas (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Contactnithin, 23 October 2010

{{edit semi-protected}}

Pakistan always considered India as its arch rival and entertain militant groups to fight against India.Pakistan's Intelligence agency ISI is also blamed for its alleged links with the militants that carried out the 2008 Mumbai shootings that leaves 166 innocent people dead and more than double injured.Since then the relation of Pakistan with India further worsend. Contactnithin (talk) 18:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 06:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 33 external links on Foreign relations of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Map showing countries hosting Pakistani missions.

Why is the map showing countries that host Pakistani missions is removed and who removed it??
|MYounis | talk 03:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because it belongs on List of diplomatic missions of Pakistan instead. Mar4d (talk) 04:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Foreign relations of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 32 external links on Foreign relations of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"has a highly disciplined and professional military"

What is the source for this claim ?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foreign relations of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was no EU in 1947

The international recognition thing doesn’t make sense. How can an entity that doesn’t exist recognise independence? 2.44.10.109 (talk) 10:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

@Mister Banker So the reason why I reverted your edit is because I believe that the United Nations Digital Library is enough proof to the dates of establishment of diplomatic relations and because it adds too much bytes to the article which may lag the article. I believe that restoring the sources you did is unnecessary. Underdwarf58 (talk) 22:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your continuous reverts seem like WP:OWN behaviour. Besides, WP:CHOKING isn't a concern at this point. Moreover, having WP:DIVERSE sources is better than relying on a single source. Mister Banker (talk) 07:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Semsûrî I need your thoughts on this Underdwarf58 (talk) 09:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, this user is confirmed a sockpuppet Underdwarf58 (talk) 09:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]